On Debunking 9/11 Debunking

In  this  paper,  we  examine  the  claims  of  Dr.  David  Ray  Griffin  regarding  the  NIST investigation  into  the  World  Trade  Center  disasters,  and  find  those  claims  to  be unfounded.    All  18  major claims  are discussed  and  rigorously dismissed,  and  a  further analysis of the text reveals an overwhelming density of factual and logical errors.  This paper refutes  Dr.  Griffin’s  major  claims,  supporting  with  evidence  that  the  aircraft impacts were expected to significantly damage the structures, that the resulting fires were of both sufficient temperature and duration to cause structural collapse, that a progressive collapse  resulting  in  total  destruction of  the Towers  was  the  likely  result,  and  that  the “controlled demolition” hypothesis is speculative and unsupported by any evidence.  We also  discuss  the  anticipated  NIST  report  on  World  Trade  Center  Seven.  The  author highlights  the  fundamental  sources  of errors  present  in  Dr.  Griffin’s  research  and
provides a template to evaluate future claims using resources available in open literature.

CLICK BELOW FOR A COMPLETE ANALYSIS.

http://www.jod911.com/drg_nist_review_2_1.pdf